Quote:
Originally Posted by wiredantz
After all the research i did... I am going to put it into perspective:
Liberties and rights before the constitution are still granted by the constitution...
When cases go up to the supreme court, they get to pick and choose their cases. Why?
The Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each Term. The Court grants and hears oral argument in about 80 cases. (a lot of the cases are so controversial that the supreme court rules them 5-4)
THERE IS NO WAY IN THE WORLD THERE GOING TO HEAR A CASE THAT WILL BREAK THE SYSTEM.
After all the research that i did, and the CDFW issues you a complaint.
The judge will ask you how do you plea?
You are not going to plea....
Your going to ask for a demur for a motion of dismiss.
CDFW filed that complaint they have to prove they have jurisdiction over your right to restricted fishing.
that is going to cost them money to defend.
At the end of the day, the Judge does not want to be held liable for breaking the system so if you know your rights it will probably be dismissed.
But once again, take my words with a grain of salt...( im learning)
we still pay for registration of guns, mirage licenses, driver licenses,, and many other things.
im getting a fishing license...for 2017 unless i can claim i have a disability.
IF CDFW files the complaint ( citation) you have a right to trial by jury. They pay, you don't pay...
If you lose and want to appeal, then you pay....
correct me if im wrong...
|
Agreed, they're not going to bite the hand that's feeding them. I'm not going to test it until I know how to file a lawsuit first. I'm down for taking risks, but a calculated risk is a little better than just winging it.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk