View Single Post
Old 12-16-2015, 01:35 PM   #13
momo fish
Senior Member
 
momo fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 1,491
The man has spoken.. X2..

I ran both types in the water and anything in the mid to high 100's the 83 doesn't show you much bottom structure compared to the 50.. High chirp works great but at times I find using just 200 sufficient in shallow water...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck D View Post
50/200 is way better then the 83 for deepwater. Have had both and the 83 hardly works in deep water. It is made for better resolution in shallow water applications.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
momo fish is offline   Reply With Quote