![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 754
|
Those maps are hard to read. WG 2 has the lightest impact - no additional closures at all.
In the LJ area: WG1 - reserve and SMCA at south LJ. Plus a big reserve at N Pt Loma. Can you say compaction? This group is not done; still arguing over north SD county. WG2 - existing closure only at LJ. SAT guidelines met with north Pt Loma reserve WG3 - closes south LJ thru Crystal Pier. No closure at Pt Loma. Enlarges existing LJ closures enlarged, bait only at the pier. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|