![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chula Vista
Posts: 1,589
|
Nothing wrong with letting the big ones go but that they are not good eating is BS. Mike
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 1,136
|
I thought I read that after they get to a certain size they are no longer good breeders either. Not that I have done any hooping yet but I read a lot of stuff and seem to remember reading that the really big ones are past their prime and it isn't necessary to release them unless it just makes you feel good to let something go that has survived so many years.
__________________
you can't eat it if you release it |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 1,872
|
What?
Quote:
Lobsters produce eggs exponentially to their size...so a really big female produces 10x times as many eggs as a bug that is half as small. Large lobsters can only mate with another large lobster...anything smaller and they may eat the smaller bug. During the Lobster FMP meetings with DFW we talked about a slot limit as some other states do (releasing the small and big bugs and just keeping a medium size). But the DFW biologists didn't think it was an efficient way to go with regulating the resource.
__________________
Jim / Saba Slayer ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 1,136
|
Quote:
__________________
you can't eat it if you release it |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|