![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 33
|
![]()
quote=aguachico;19373]mas info; please note the date. I am also looking for an article that was in the UT. There's also a prominent scientist/diver from scripps that is barking about how there are no more fish in the kelp blah blah blah.
http://www-csgc.ucsd.edu/RESEARCH/PR...ytonRCZ177.pdf Looks like your prominent Scientist/Diver just got appointed to the Science Advisory Team that will advise the Task Force. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 698
|
This might be the right compromise, closing the kelp south of Windansea. It appears to be based on science and balanced to allow continued recreational fishing.
I'm too ignorant on the facts to have a strong opinion myself, still trying to figure it all out. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=csgc |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|