We are asked to pay for this - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

dos ballenas · 11-07-2009, 07:57 AM

so what are you saying Cuda? Should we lift the ban on high seas drift net fishing? Why not let them gill net in shore again as well?

2 am huh, must have been a rough night...

GregAndrew · 11-07-2009, 07:42 PM

Supposedly pelagics, which would be the targets of those drift nets, are not considered by the MLPA process. However, they still use the depletion caused by them in the past against us. I agree about the DDT. There are far better ways to spend effort and money (artificial reef building and contamination clean-up) than closing fishing areas.

'Cuda · 11-09-2009, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dos ballenas

so what are you saying Cuda? Should we lift the ban on high seas drift net fishing? Why not let them gill net in shore again as well?

2 am huh, must have been a rough night...

What I'm saying is, ya goof, is the unregulated netting is why our shores are so depleted now. And by the way I suffer from Menieres disease and one of the symptoms is sleeplessness.

11-07-2009, 07:57 AM	#1
dos ballenas Vampyroteuthis infernalis Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 585	so what are you saying Cuda? Should we lift the ban on high seas drift net fishing? Why not let them gill net in shore again as well? 2 am huh, must have been a rough night... __________________ ____________________________________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-07-2009, 07:42 PM	#2
GregAndrew Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,384	Supposedly pelagics, which would be the targets of those drift nets, are not considered by the MLPA process. However, they still use the depletion caused by them in the past against us. I agree about the DDT. There are far better ways to spend effort and money (artificial reef building and contamination clean-up) than closing fishing areas.