![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redlands CA
Posts: 871
|
I have sharpied a ruler on both sides of my kayak with marks at 13-22-28"
I think they should crackdown on all guys fishing on the breakwall in NPH.they have no licence and keep everything regardless of size-season-etc.You all know who I am talking about...
__________________
Barachit Baralah,Elohim-In the beginning,God-Genesis 1:1 ![]() "Who among you,if your son asked for a fish would give them a serpent " Jesus Matt. 7:10 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san diego
Posts: 97
|
net requirement
I believe the CA law requires you have a net if you are targeting halibut. It's been a long time since I read that Reg and it never made sense to me b/c how can you prove you are or are not targeting a specific species. Maybe somebody else who has it fresher in their memory or somebody with a law degree can set the record straight.
I don't think PFD, horn, flares, type IV (throwable), and light requirements apply to yaks b/c it's they are not technically a "vessel" but rather a water sport device(that's why they don't require CF #s). But I definitely think lights are great idea voluntarily - it can be hard to see yaks from a boat. OEX sells waterproof Scotty lights that fit in the deck and are easily removable and pretty cheap. They don't require any wiring - 2 alkaline batteries. You could even clip a glow stick to a rod tip.
__________________
that's why they call it fishing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Rookie of the Month Club
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mira Mesa
Posts: 483
|
Ran into them a few times this year @ LJ, just wish I had a reason for them to inspect my license if ya know what I mean!!
![]()
__________________
they are getting bigger.... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Danny
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 70
|
The DFG here is not bad at all. The ones in WA state suck just plan a holes. I had never been fishing there and was trying to catch a trout and got a ticket for salmon. I was at fort lewis and had never fished there before. The guys here are great I have got some great tips from them. They are state workers and have plenty to be pissed about.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Gilrockit
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hesperia, Ca
Posts: 46
|
Just last week I saw some guys at NPH from my kayak taking short Halibut! it ticked me off! Whats the number to fish and game for poachers!!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: La Mesa
Posts: 386
|
1888 DFG-CALTIP
18883342258 When it comes to polluters, DFG is useless. I called them once to report a ton of pollution in the SD river in Santee, and they simply told me its not their problem, and that I should contact the city. ![]()
__________________
Need a custom rod wrapped? PM me! http://s686.photobucket.com/albums/vv222/fishinkid2010/Sample%20Rod%20Wrapping/?albumview=slideshow ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 520
|
Gil, was it guys in a rental skiff? The guys on the jetty as well as the Rental skiff guys are pretty damn bad.
Can Harbor Patrol enforce Fish and Game regulations? Poachers at Newport are rampant. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
|
A lot of the surveyors are associated with NOAA and not the DFG and thus no fear in reporting your catch. But there should be no fear anyways. You should know the regs well enough to not break the rules with whatever it is you're doing.
Its a big deal that they get accurate catch information. At a conference I was at recently, they were talking about the problems associated with not haven't a level of precision in data collection for the recreational take of fish like they do for the commercial fleet. Its like anything in science, as the "n" gets smaller, the standard deviation most commonly gets bigger and the tendancy for the California legislature is to use the most "conservative" estimate (most restrictive) when deciding on matters such as the MPA's. There was even talk of using sportboat daily reports as a means of data collection. Its a good thing those are NEVER inflated ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Gilrockit
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hesperia, Ca
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fullerton
Posts: 1,361
|
Quote:
I have heard of people having their vehicles confiscated as well as their gear when they do this |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richland Oregon
Posts: 1,547
|
I have only had run ins with 1 warden who for some reason decided He did not like me, see him at least once a year (usually hunting) and he does everything short of a cavity search. Even though i dont care for him I still let him check everything because It is nice to see these guys out there doing their job and protecting our resources.
For those of us that do support the 385 wardens that patrol our state may I suggest this: http://dfg.ca.gov/WardenStamp/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richland Oregon
Posts: 1,547
|
Quote:
That was somewhat my thought too. One for the truck and one for the duck boat.... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|