|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-24-2015, 04:09 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
MUM
|
04-24-2015, 04:12 PM | #22 |
Vampyroteuthis infernalis
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 585
|
Just curious, but do you have any evidence on this? I would love to see it
__________________
____________________________________________ |
04-24-2015, 05:33 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,856
|
__________________
www.facebook.com/Teamsewer |
04-24-2015, 05:38 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 552
|
|
04-24-2015, 05:45 PM | #25 | |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
|
|
04-24-2015, 05:47 PM | #26 |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
But I do kinda like the tag system for tuna. interesting idea.
|
04-24-2015, 06:00 PM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
Lol, to funny, you totally missed it; as in a swing and a strike times 3. |
|
04-24-2015, 09:15 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
The links and Graphs are still good
Quote:
Please read the articles quoted, at GISS, EPA, and NOAA. https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...tipping-point/ http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/sci...low-temps.html http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/ https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/...-at-ushcngiss/ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/2...a-quality-act/ In the Science World, data integrity is everything. I'm not aiming to change your opinions, just please be aware that just because it has a government label behind it does not mean it does not have an agenda. This is straight from the GISS: Q. Do the raw data ever change? A. The raw data always stays the same, except for occasional reported corrections or replacements of preliminary data from one source by reports obtained later from a more trusted source. So why did the raw data change? It will take a good day to sift through the datasets and overlay them, but let me know if you come up with a different conclusion. |
|
04-24-2015, 09:24 PM | #29 |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
I'm sorry I shouldn't call names or make harsh comments. I just feel passionate about this issue...
|
04-24-2015, 09:29 PM | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
Once would be ignorant to believe
Quote:
No need for name calling, I may be a redneck but I take offense at you assuming I have a facebook account. BWE and BD is my social media. May I ask who you trust for you data sources? Rest assured I do not get my datasets from facebook, the above links might give you clues as to what sites a carouse. ( sorry I didn't include mother jones in there, but I do check it out) A healthy debate is necessary, but let us please stick to what we perceive as facts, until properly corrected. Hope you get an opportunity to get that "solo" kayak BFT this summer, and if not this summer, the next, or the next, or the next. |
|
04-24-2015, 09:32 PM | #31 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
No worries my friend
Quote:
No sweat, it's good to be passionate about something rather than nothing. And you can't go wrong with being passionate about fishing. It's in my blood, probably in yours, most likely fighting for the same things, just possibly different avenues of attack. |
|
04-24-2015, 10:17 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 2,169
|
Lip ripper,
The very first link you provided starts with two negative comments about Obama......it took no more than 3 seconds to establish the credibility of your link. It was bustin on the president and not talking science. Never made it to the second link. I got to get going now....FOX NEWS is running a special on global warming myths....( but you already knew that) Tight lines my scientist friend. Last edited by StinkyMatt; 04-24-2015 at 10:18 PM. Reason: Spelling |
04-25-2015, 07:04 AM | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 516
|
Why smear? Can't refute the data?
Quote:
Please highlight the word Obama in the below article. Unless I am having some eyesight issues, I don't see him mentioned at all. NOAA Data Tampering Reaches A Tipping Point Posted on November 3, 2013 by stevengoddard NOAA reported that September was the warmest ever on Earth, even though satellites showed September as being close to the median. This tipped me off that they have gone into full cheating, damn the torpedoes mode. Check out the level of tampering they achieved for September US temperatures. NCDC shows a strong warming trend for September in the US. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/ But the actual thermometer data which they use shows a cooling trend. Index of /pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/ I immediately knew that we were looking at a record data tampering event. They have now passed two degrees of cheating in the US record. The graph below shows the difference between NCDC measured and reported data. As you can see, they are basically reducing temperatures from the past linearly with age. NOAA has degenerated into a spectacularly immoral state, where their primary purpose seems to be to generate climate propaganda. Last week they were lying again about the 1,000 year rainfall in Colorado. It is pathetic. Where does it say anything about Obama in this article? If you don't believe the data, you are more than free to do so. That is your right. But you did not refute the data. You smeared my sources by adding something that was not there. Heavy tactic you have there my friend. |
|
04-25-2015, 07:18 AM | #34 |
donkey roper
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific Beach
Posts: 968
|
So because there are small discrepancies in temperature data which may have been "modified" by NOAA, then we should dismiss the entire organization, and indeed the 100 years plus of collective scientific knowledge generated by NOAA researchers?
If there was a CAT 5 hurricane bearing down on your family's home and NOAA, who is the only reputable marine weather service we have, predicted landfall nearby, would you call mom up and say "I dunno mom... These kooks over at NWS often falsify their data and are likely exaggerating the danger"? I think not. I trust NOAA wholeheartedly, with my life. So do you, and you don't even realize it. Where do you think all the marine weather data comes from? Magic seaweed?? They have been directly responsible for saving thousands of lives and billions of dollars worth of property, and that's only in the last couple decades. I have many friends who work at fisheries and my girlfriend works at Scripps. Of course, they have an agenda like any other well funded organization. 2012 was a cold year water wise. I'm not surprised there were discrepancies in their data set. But saying human induced global climate change isn't real, now that is pseudo-science. Sure the geologic record shows climate change, even dramatic in scale. The current patterns we are experiencing are UNPRECEDENTED in the geologic record... Like 1000x faster than we have any record of. Does it mean global warming or ice age? I don't know and won't venture to guess... But assuming some rightwing internet trolls knows more about global climate than the ARMY of PhDs from NOAA is a real shame. You are asserting that there is some conspiracy and that scientists are purposefully misinforming the public? These scientists argue with each other more than they would ever debate with a outside entity. All they do is try to prove each other wrong. Do you realize the amount of proof and peer defense that a team has to go through to even present an idea as a HYPOTHESIS, let alone a theory? Please give them a little more credit. These are the same guys who have completely shut down the commercial sardine fishery this year. Why would they do something silly like that? Maybe it's because they are the only ones preventing man from completely decimating what is left of our ocean? |
04-25-2015, 08:13 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 552
|
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them think.
|
04-25-2015, 12:02 PM | #36 |
Made in U.S.A.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dana Point
Posts: 1,625
|
How they go from 10 to 2 in one change kinda tells me that they aren't paying attention and just had another "Oh Shit" moment.
I hate government regulation but it's a necessary evil, like government itself.
__________________
Hobie PA 14 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Jackson Kraken ¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu X-Factor ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Malibu Stealth-12 ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> Its not a spelling B its a fishing B ~yakjoe |
04-25-2015, 01:46 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Gawd, at least with Facebook I would not have to keep seeing posts by zealots using Hyperbole and Metaphor to argue their "facts". I delete any "friends" that do that for anything but a joke (on either side of issues). If a raindrop falls on your head, does that really mean that the sky is falling?
|
04-25-2015, 02:51 PM | #38 | |
Large Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: La Verne, CA
Posts: 1,008
|
Quote:
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/im...o-DC_Brief.pdf Hardly seems like a conspiracy to me. If anything, seems to me, at worst making poor conclusions on faulty data. |
|
04-25-2015, 03:53 PM | #39 |
Emperor
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 3,649
|
My graph
__________________
There's nothing colder than yesterday's hotdog. |
04-26-2015, 08:51 PM | #40 |
Fishing Patriot
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,121
|
__________________
|
|
|