Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2013, 10:09 AM   #1
Croaker Dave
Senior Member
 
Croaker Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 171
SoCal Leads Nation In Seafood Mislabeling

This year's Oceania seafood labeling study is out and was particularly damning to Southern California. Although the bulk of it was rockfish being labeled as red snapper, something consumers around here have come to excpect as standard procedure. Still, you should know what you are getting and you might care about sustainability of the slow-growing rockfish. Many other interesting data in the study. For example, I didn't know that 100% of yellowtail/hamachi sold in sushi restaraunts (in the study) is mislabeled farm-raised Japanese amberjack/buri, which the study says is probably not intentional deception. It's not that different and still a seriola, but I don't buy that it's unintentional because nobody is more serious about subtleties in seafood variations than the Japanese seafood chef. They'll even have different names for the same species caught in different seasons or different seas around Japan.

Southern California led the country with the highest rate of seafood mislabeling from grocery stores and
one of the highest from sushi restaurants. Of the 74 different retail outlets visited, 45 of them sold
mislabeled seafood. While grocery stores had the lowest rate of mislabeling (32 percent), consumers
should be disturbed to learn that almost one in three samples from grocery stores were mislabeled. Our
study revealed that 84 percent of the sushi purchased was mislabeled, a shameful statistic for a state with
a sushi roll named after it.

Of the 21 sushi venues visited, only one sold correctly labeled seafood. The other 20 (95 percent) sold at
least one fish that was mislabeled, according to the FDA.
Oceana originally released the results of our Southern California testing in April 2012.
13 Since then, the
Los Angeles County Seafood Task Force
14 conducted its own study and found 74 percent of the seafood
facilities investigated sold mislabeled seafood, validating Oceana’s findings.
15 The pervasive false and
inaccurate seafood labels were found at all levels of seafood commerce including retail, wholesale and
import levels. The Los Angeles County officials are following up with corrective actions, including

continued inspections, oversight and enforcement.

http://oceana.org/sites/default/file...ults_FINAL.pdf
Croaker Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 11:19 AM   #2
Cbad Mike
Senior Member
 
Cbad Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Carlsbad Ca.
Posts: 1,206
That's pretty interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Cbad Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2013, 12:59 PM   #3
captnblood34
Senior Member
 
captnblood34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Otay
Posts: 704
Thanks for that
captnblood34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 08:35 PM   #4
JarrodMc
Senior Member
 
JarrodMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vista
Posts: 411
Yeah I've heard something like that before. Thanks for bringing it back to mind
JarrodMc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2013, 08:45 PM   #5
jruiz
Large Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: La Verne, CA
Posts: 1,002
Imitation Calamari

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2482063.html
jruiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.