|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
02-19-2019, 08:00 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 254
|
|
02-19-2019, 08:23 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
|
02-19-2019, 10:25 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 254
|
|
02-20-2019, 02:36 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
|
02-20-2019, 05:50 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 118
|
Good info.
I'm looking to upgrade my sonar from the Fischer Price Lowrance toy I have. Would you guys recommend DI for where we fish or is it just fluff? |
02-20-2019, 06:39 PM | #6 | |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Lowrance makes a good unit. If you dial it in right, you can get even the cheapest of units to make a picture like those above. Down imaging is more for shallow water and locating structure. Locally it would be best for fishing spotties/sandies on structure in the bays. |
|
02-21-2019, 02:57 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,384
|
Quote:
Agree with all of this. Downscan can be great for pinpointing structure for Lobstering etc. Sidescan I am finding useful for determining "Which way did they go George?". |
|
|
|