MLPA meeting highlights / lowlights in real time - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

rastrev · 10-22-2009, 02:57 PM

Looks like they could give a #$% what we asked for yesterday. South LJ is the main focus of both sides in SD County.

A couple "positives";

Right before they went on break there was an argument made for pelagics allowed in water deeper than 50m in South LJ. I did not hear any complaints.

Also, there is an attempt to make the South LJ SMR smaller since the Swami's SMCA meets the size and spacing guidlines, even heard one of the guys on the BRTF speaking in favor of a smaller than 9 square mile SMR in LJ. Keep you fingers crossed

10-22-2009, 02:57 PM	#11
rastrev Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: SD, CA Posts: 173	Looks like they could give a #$% what we asked for yesterday. South LJ is the main focus of both sides in SD County. A couple "positives"; Right before they went on break there was an argument made for pelagics allowed in water deeper than 50m in South LJ. I did not hear any complaints. Also, there is an attempt to make the South LJ SMR smaller since the Swami's SMCA meets the size and spacing guidlines, even heard one of the guys on the BRTF speaking in favor of a smaller than 9 square mile SMR in LJ. Keep you fingers crossed __________________ "If a fish could keep his mouth shut, he would never get caught." - U-Roy, Fisherman Style