|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-06-2010, 06:42 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
In other words, i would have no problem using a tarpon 160 with 375lbs on deck, but I would not use another brand of kayak to their limit. make sense?
__________________
|
|
12-06-2010, 06:55 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 344
|
|
12-06-2010, 07:48 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 89
|
WS Weight
I have a Tarpon 160 and Love it. Weight capacity is very high in my standards. I weigh 250, then add five gallons of water in the bait tank, tackle, rods, emergency equipment and layered clothes. The thing floats and performs well with all of that. I can't say much when I have fish on board because I don't catch much.
|
12-08-2010, 05:28 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Santee, CA
Posts: 103
|
WT.....freak?
What on earth do you need shocks like that for?
Gonna race to the local duck hunt? Ha Ha... I love my tarpon 160... cowboybill |
12-10-2010, 01:16 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richland Oregon
Posts: 1,547
|
yeah I should be pulling 20-22" of travel on the rear end. Its great for the dirt roads and after duck season.
|
12-29-2010, 12:18 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
|
who got some xmas cash?
__________________
|
|
|