Thread: CDFG
View Single Post
Old 09-06-2016, 04:21 PM   #3
wiredantz
Currently @ MLO Territory
 
wiredantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
Supreme Court Cases Used by CDFW

CDFW- sent me the hardcopies of the supreme court cases regarding my argument.


Mr. _____________,

The information provided by Ms. Orme is correct, and it seems pretty clear and straightforward. Except for on free fishing days, or from specific public piers in ocean waters, fishing licenses are required in California. Also, In re Quinn is not a federal case. You seem to be making an argument that was rejected by the courts long ago. I encourage you to review the attached court decisions or consult private counsel, but there is not much more to be said regarding this matter. Thanks,


Nathan Goedde
Senior Staff Counsel
California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
nathan.goedde@wildlife.ca.gov







































CDFW has not provided any other court case other than these two.....
__________________


Team: Disbanded
You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it

Last edited by wiredantz; 09-06-2016 at 04:29 PM.
wiredantz is offline   Reply With Quote