![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Currently @ MLO Territory
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Under the Shadow
Posts: 2,290
|
Supreme Court Cases Used by CDFW
CDFW- sent me the hardcopies of the supreme court cases regarding my argument.
Mr. _____________, The information provided by Ms. Orme is correct, and it seems pretty clear and straightforward. Except for on free fishing days, or from specific public piers in ocean waters, fishing licenses are required in California. Also, In re Quinn is not a federal case. You seem to be making an argument that was rejected by the courts long ago. I encourage you to review the attached court decisions or consult private counsel, but there is not much more to be said regarding this matter. Thanks, Nathan Goedde Senior Staff Counsel California Dept. of Fish & Wildlife 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 nathan.goedde@wildlife.ca.gov ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() CDFW has not provided any other court case other than these two.....
__________________
![]() Team: Disbanded You only have one chance in this life...make the right decision(s)...so you don't regret it
Last edited by wiredantz; 09-06-2016 at 04:29 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|