Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > Kayak Fishing Reports

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2008, 09:48 AM   #1
madscientist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,906
The idea that the T shark population is thriving because there is a good 2 or 3 weeks of fishing for them in LJ seems pretty flimsy. I know many long time boaters who feel that the explosion of internet fishing has hugely increased the number of guys out there successfully targeting T's, the effect of which remains to be seen.

Personally, I find threshers to be magnificent animals. I've taken them in the past and will do so again, but I hope we have the chance to tangle with them for many years to come.
__________________
madscientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:06 AM   #2
aguachico
Senior Member
 
aguachico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 719
I've seen pics of longliners catching green t-sharks in both US and Mexican waters. Are the LJ tsharks green T-sharks?

About 8 years ago, there were a small group of mouse trappers targeting TS in LJ. They would work at the 200ft line from the pier heading north.

As far as conservation goes, I eat one a year if possible. The DFG should step up and create a reg that is based on science instead of PETA. I do remember that when Doc Cherry was getting them off the paddle board, tsahrks were a nusance. They would steal you macs when you left the pier. Bait was tough to get at times. Imho; it seems there are less t-sharks now then 8 years ago.
aguachico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:11 AM   #3
Zed
BANNED
 
Zed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: W of 5
Posts: 1,265
Thanks mad, that's what struck me too.

And to add, how many times have you read [on the internet] "I only take one a year, blah, blah, blah"?

Say 500 folks only taking one a year. Thats five hundred local sharks taken out of the system. There may be 500 yak fishermen that only get 1 YT a year (LJ loc's not withstanding), but a school of YT could have 500 fish. A school of sharks is maybe 5. Just thinking aloud.

I think once one starts the thresher fishing, it evens out because there is a realization that releases become a better option, vs the PITA of the kill/paddle/clean/disposal/storage/possible waste.
Zed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 10:18 AM   #4
dos ballenas
Vampyroteuthis infernalis
 
dos ballenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 585
"Common threshers are dark green, Bigeye threshers are brown and Pelagic threshers are generally blue. Lighting conditions and water clarity can affect how any one shark appears to an observer, but the color test is generally supported when other features are examined."

It's also called blue thresher, green thresher, longtail shark, swiveltail, fox shark, or sea fox...

This year seems to be much slower than last year already... if you do decide to keep one let me know...if you can deliver the stomach and any other stats I can add it to a local study being done...
dos ballenas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 11:16 AM   #5
THE DARKHORSE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seven minutes from the launch!
Posts: 987
UMKAY....

Being a surfer for close to twenty-five years now I have a deal with sharks. Being blessed (I think), with an opportunity to witness more than one Great White Shark from the perspective of the water on seperate occasions has probably affected my descision. A sort of "get out of jail free" with all shark species if you will. I have "never" harvested a shark and never will (Thresher, Mako, Leopard). Anyone who knows me personally will attest to my practices of C and R. This includes big White Seabass, Yellowtail, and Halibut (not only sharks). I'm certainly no Marine Biolagist and would agree with the insufficient data aspect concerning all marine species (unless it's a fish-tank obvious challenges at work). That being said, I always change my fishing practices this time of year. This would include not even putting bait in the water (strictly sight fishing) and virtually eliminating annoying ("annoying to me", going through a whole roll of flouro in a day, countless hooks, and possibly harming "pups") by-catch. O.K., I will retract my loose-phraseing of "thriveing" and replace that with my "personal opinion" of healthy stock. I thought my post was a simple contrast to my status quote of "secret guy". I just wanted to know how it feels to tell people " go get one" and maybe make their day if not year. Considering how this is so well received concerning White Seabass posts (a fish that I have spent thirty, twelve hour days out of the last two months buried in the kelp without "one to show for it".

Not being a Marine Biolagist and admittingly ignorant on this subject, it's "my opinion" that the average "fishing once a month kayak angler" would be hard pressed to affect the overall Thresher stock. Of coarse, using the "Bloody Decks supposed rule of one a year in" in mind. This combined with the fact that "true breeder size sharks responsible for the majority of reproduction" are almost impossible to "land" from a kayak (even the most experienced angler with a 30 wide and support group).

An experiment from a simple fisherman not to be confused with a "Marine biolagist" : While not even dragging bait to lower chances of "annoying by-catch", one cast all day with the iron and guess what I caught.
THE DARKHORSE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 11:33 AM   #6
Handymansd
Ancient Member
 
Handymansd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: On The Water
Posts: 935
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE DARKHORSE View Post
An experiment from a simple fisherman not to be confused with a "Marine biolagist" : While not even dragging bait to lower chances of "annoying by-catch", one cast all day with the iron and guess what I caught.
And obviously a great cast, Josh!
__________________
All men are equal before fish.
-Herbert Hoover

Handymansd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 12:23 PM   #7
dos ballenas
Vampyroteuthis infernalis
 
dos ballenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 585
"
Not being a Marine Biolagist and admittingly ignorant on this subject, it's "my opinion" that the average "fishing once a month kayak angler" would be hard pressed to affect the overall Thresher stock. Of coarse, using the "Bloody Decks supposed rule of one a year in" in mind. This combined with the fact that "true breeder size sharks responsible for the majority of reproduction" are almost impossible to "land" from a kayak (even the most experienced angler with a 30 wide and support group).
[/quote]

Thats fine, most on this site aren't marine biolOgists either, who said I was, I used google
That being said, I feel that you deserve the respect you have earned as a kayak fisherman in WCW 07, and there are many others out there that take what you have to say to heart, and being in your position you have the power to influence and inspire. Use it wisely... and the perks will keep coming.

Its true the average size fish a kayak will take is gonna be under 100 lbs, aka a pup...
If the kayakers work together with the guys from BD killing all the breaders maybe we can drive them T sharks to extinction slow to grow, let them go, except for calicos that is
dos ballenas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 12:56 PM   #8
madscientist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by dos ballenas View Post
"
slow to grow, let them go, except for calicos that is
Now you're talking!
__________________
madscientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.