![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Saltist is definitely not in the same class as seagate. And you probably want the narrow spool 35h for a jig stick.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: chula vista
Posts: 907
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Brandon
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,345
|
Owned plenty of both, would never buy a seagate over saltist again. I would just wait til I saved another 50 bucks for the well worth upgrade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
CEO of Team Roby
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 905
|
I own several daiwa saltist BG reels. I like em a lot. They are definitely better than the seagates in many ways. There is one area the Seagate beats the saltist though and that is in weight. This difference can be big if you are making a lot casts from a kayak.
Check both out and see which one feels best in your hand. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: chula vista
Posts: 907
|
Quote:
Seagate 20H 14.3 Saltist 16.5 30H 15.0 17.2 35H 20.4 21.1 40H 21.3 22.0 50H 21.9 22.7 It seems like the 20 and 30H models have a variance of up to 2.2 ounces. The 35H, 40 and 50 have less than an ounce difference. It doesn't really seem that much lighter to me but maybe it will feel different? To me it seems like paying 50 dollars more over the life of a reel is not that much especially if the quality is much better and if you own it for many years. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|