Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge  

Go Back   Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge > Kayak Fishing Forum - Message Board > General Kayak Fishing Discussion
Home Forum Online Store Information LJ Webcam Gallery Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2014, 11:00 AM   #1
PescadorPete
Senior Member
 
PescadorPete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Leucadia, CA
Posts: 261
I own all three of these. And I'm about your size (6'2", 160#, 34"). The sport is too small, can't extend your legs enough when peddling, doesn't paddle all that well (if you want to paddle it) and I didn't like the vertical sides on it, makes it blow around in the wind. So I sold it.

I use the Revo 11 for lake fishing, the Revo 13 for the ocean. Even thought the cockpit is narrow, you shouldn't have any trouble fitting in either one. The 13 cockpit seems a bit longer so you can get a better stretch on your legs when peddling. Both these kayaks also paddle nicely. And no hull slap. I prefer the 13 in the ocean, especially if it is getting rough out.

The cockpits are small compared to the Outback or PA so you won't have a lot of room to stash stuff above deck. I don't find that much of an issue since I don't take much out with me anyway.

You should test drive them and see what fits.
PescadorPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 11:06 AM   #2
DanaPT
Senior Member
 
DanaPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South OC
Posts: 1,606
I wouldn't rule-out the outback. Super stable. and easy for 1 guy to "tip and lift" onto a rack. It's a 1 person gig, but I'm lifting on a car.

Good luck .
DanaPT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 09:25 PM   #3
pbb
Senior Member
 
pbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Diego
Posts: 149
Sounds like I should probably rule out the Sport based on leg room alone.

I guess the weight for cartopping is not the end of the world.

As far as I can tell my 2011-ish Stealth 12 is supposed to be 60lbs (2014 are 55lbs), whereas the 2011 Outback hull was 66lb (70 now) and Revolution 13 hull was 58lb (69 since 2012). (Not sure what accounts for the additional weight since 2012- did they not count the rudder before then)?
pbb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2014, 07:59 AM   #4
bus kid
Team Keine Zugehörigkeit
 
bus kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Way out there
Posts: 2,854
I'm the same build as you and had a Revo 13 it was perfect for me. I would load it on top of my 69 bug, until I sold it and got a truck.
__________________

Não alimente os trolls------------Don't feed the trolls---------------インタネット荒らしを無視しろ

bus kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2014, 08:55 AM   #5
Bennyblanco
Ironman
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Inland empire
Posts: 175
Revo 11 would be perfect for you.
Bennyblanco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2014, 10:20 AM   #6
Mongo Johnson
Senior Member
 
Mongo Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 192
Arrange with OEX Sunset Beach to try both Revo 11 and 13. You can do it on the bay right out the shop door.

I come in at 250 and the Revo 13s still fine stability wise. You're lots less weight. Sounds like your height will push you to the 13 for legs.

Only way to tell is demo ride.

Both are roofable on a car. There's lots of spiffy roof rack to assist a one-man lift....hullavator, roller systems.

I think the Revo 13 is 60 lbs. hull weight for 2012 model. Maybe 69 now.

__________________
A day on the water . . . priceless.
Mongo Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 2002 Big Water's Edge. All rights reserved.