TV, Pac Warriors

[tacmik]

Originally Posted by Silbaugh4liberty

You don't in California either as I've recently discovered. Article 1 Section 25 of the California Constitution, check it out.

"that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season
when and the conditions under which the different species of fish
may be taken. " Condition of any and all species is that you have a fishing license.

[Dave Legacy]

The same bendo shot over and over again didn't bother me the first two episodes, but the honeymoon period is over and I'm starting to feel insulted. No doubt I'll still keep coming back week after week to be disgusted. =)

[GregAndrew]

I have figured out a way to watch it without falling asleep. DVR it and keep your thumb on the FF button. Watched the parts of that episode that looked worth playing in 20 minutes.

[Tandem Assassin]

Originally Posted by GregAndrew

I have figured out a way to watch it without falling asleep. DVR it and keep your thumb on the FF button. Watched the parts of that episode that looked worth playing in 20 minutes.

I don't think the show will be around for long as the subject matter has a small but knowledgeable audience. Ratings will be poor for a prime time Friday show and it will be cancelled shortly...

I find the footage on BWE more entertaining.

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by tacmik

"that the legislature may by statute, provide for the season
when and the conditions under which the different species of fish
may be taken. " Condition of any and all species is that you have a fishing license.

It says, "by statute, may regulate the season and method of take". Nothing about the license.

Here's some case law for ya too!


Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 (1943)
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 (1963)
If the State converts a liberty into a privilege, the Citizen can engage in the right with impunity.


Miller v. U.S., 230 F. 2nd. 486, 489 (5th Cir. 1959) Id. at 489-490
The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.

[octico]

Originally Posted by Silbaugh4liberty

It says, "by statute, may regulate the season and method of take". Nothing about the license.

Here's some case law for ya too!


Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 (1943)
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 (1963)
If the State converts a liberty into a privilege, the Citizen can engage in the right with impunity.


Miller v. U.S., 230 F. 2nd. 486, 489 (5th Cir. 1959) Id. at 489-490
The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.

Where you been in Kevin? Good luck trying to use that argument in court. Its pretty clear in the fish and game code.

Article 2. General Provisions - California Fish and Game Code Section 7121

7121. Except as otherwise provided by this code or by regulation,
it is unlawful to sell or purchase any fish or amphibia taken in, or
brought into, the waters of the state, or brought ashore at any point
in the state.
It is unlawful to buy, sell, or possess in any place of business
where fish are bought, sold, or processed, any fish or amphibia taken
on any boat, barge, or vessel which carries sport fishermen, except
those fish may be possessed in such a place only for the purposes of
canning or smoking under regulations adopted by the commission.

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by octico

Where you been in Kevin? Good luck trying to use that argument in court. Its pretty clear in the fish and game code.

Article 2. General Provisions - California Fish and Game Code Section 7121

Hey John, sorry I've been MIA! Been real busy, might be changing jobs soon, church, etc. Did some fishing yesterday with a buddy near the rigs south of izors, limited on rockies for the 3 of us real easily, they were throwing up those red tuna crabs. Didn't know those things were still around. No bait tank, and couldn't find any in the spots my buddy went, so that's all we got.

The key word your missing in that dfg reg. Is "BUSINESS". Are you a business? Those codes are statutory, meaning they don't apply if you don't engage in the contract via "fishing license". Keep in mind, a license is getting permission to do something that you not be able to do, without asking permission. However, the California Constitution is very clear that it is a RIGHT, which cannot be converted into a privilege, and attach a fee, and license for.

[Iceman]

This is the scene that I felt really insulted my intelligence............do you believe there were sharks at the time he had these fish on or was it just fabricated adding in some shark scenes?

and why did they land at that lil beach after paddling 5 miles down river to get there?

http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/pa...-double-catch/

[Aznronin]

Originally Posted by Iceman

This is the scene that I felt really insulted my intelligence............do you believe there were sharks at the time he had these fish on or was it just fabricated adding in some shark scenes?

and why did they land at that lil beach after paddling 5 miles down river to get there?

http://www.discovery.com/tv-shows/pa...-double-catch/

These guys are quickly becoming the Kardashians of Kayakfishing. Everything is glamorous and fake as hell. I wonder who will become addicted to crack and who will get the transgender sex change. Lol

[HELLSTER INC.]

Originally Posted by Aznronin

These guys are quickly becoming the Kardashians of Kayakfishing. Everything is glamorous and fake as hell. I wonder who will become addicted to crack and who will get the transgender sex change. Lol

What i said from the beginning!!!