Put the mackerel out to soon. 4/8/16

[MITCHELL]

Speech less.

[ful-rac]

Well unfortunately you admittedly committed the crime...the fine seems pretty excessive to me. But good news is that the BWE's unofficial Legal Expert is on your team. Soon you will be notified of the steps you should take in this matter. You will soon learn that it is illegal to make things illegal thus you will be victorious in your long protracted legal fight. You might incur several thousands of dollars in costs, due to lost work, travel expenses, possible arrest for non payment of fine, real attorney fees and possibly having to pay the fine anyways in the end... But not to fear! You are the test case! We will be watching and hoping you can stick it to the MAN! (totally at your expense of course)


By the way if you get arrested for not showing up in court for not paying the fine....uhhh It's not really anybody's fault here just so you know...

[katchfish]

Hmmm!

I'm guessing you're going to fight that one.

[MITCHELL]

For over 20 plus years how many times do you think I have been to count with or without a lawyer

[YakDout]

Originally Posted by MITCHELL

For over 20 plus years how many times do you think I have been to count with or without a lawyer

20

[jruiz]

Maybe Silbaugh4liberty can help you win your case buy finding you just the right quotes and memes

[Silbaugh4liberty]

Originally Posted by jruiz

Maybe Silbaugh4liberty can help you win your case buy finding you just the right quotes and memes

Or instead of being an idiot, I would file an Affidavit of Poverty, it basically states that under due process of law (which is a secured liberty), according to the Supreme Court (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105), a state may not impose a charge (i.e.bail), for the exercise of a secured liberty such as a Constitutional due process of the law.

Or you can be a little bitch and clown on someone because you don't know jack shit. It's your choice, but I prefer being a man and putting their ass on notice.



Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

[stevie951]

Originally Posted by Silbaugh4liberty

Or instead of being an idiot, I would file an Affidavit of Poverty, it basically states that under due process of law (which is a secured liberty), according to the Supreme Court (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105), a state may not impose a charge (i.e.bail), for the exercise of a secured liberty such as a Constitutional due process of the law.

Or you can be a little bitch and clown on someone because you don't know jack shit. It's your choice, but I prefer being a man and putting their ass on notice.



Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

LMAO! But in all seriousness, burden of proof here in this specific case is going to lie on the Accuser. All the DFG officer said he had was sight of you through his binoculars using three poles.. No physical proof to show the judge whatsoever.. Now because you admitted it here (1st mistake, never admit wrong doing) and i'm sure to the officer as well, integrity comes in to play; to fight the ticket in court or to just plead guilty? As said previously, YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY THE FINE BEFORE THE JUDGE SEES YOU; but, if you are found not guilty, your $1100 will be refunded.. So start saving, and the day before your Mandatory appearance, call and extend that date by one month to give you some extra time to save up (;

[MITCHELL]

[That shit in person.QUOTE=Silbaugh4liberty;260156]Or instead of being an idiot, I would file an Affidavit of Poverty, it basically states that under due process of law (which is a secured liberty), according to the Supreme Court (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105), a state may not impose a charge (i.e.bail), for the exercise of a secured liberty such as a Constitutional due process of the law.

Or you can be a little bitch and clown on someone because you don't know jack shit. It's your choice, but I prefer being a man and putting their ass on notice.



Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]