![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Olivenhain Bob
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Olivenhain, CA
Posts: 1,122
|
I had not seen that shark sign before. I am curious, did the shark union and the folks responsible for posting that sign get together and decide that after a month or so had passed following the shark attack, everything would be back to normal? I wonder what time on that specific day the threat of shark attacks officially ended.
This photo has to be saved in the Stupid Sign Library for generations to come. Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richland Oregon
Posts: 1,547
|
Quote:
I think that the theory was that the white shark generally does not hang out in these areas and given a 3 day observation time the waters were probably more safe as most whites would move on by then. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
gurmpy old one
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: El Cajon
Posts: 80
|
I'm curious about the high contaminent levels of the area. If the seals remain
I don't think the contaminent levels are going to go down by themselves. Won't this spread to the swimming area beside the launch zone. What effect will the high bacteria counts have on the kelp and other natural flora in the area. By allowing the seals to stay it would seem that they could be risking a higher ecological problem down the road. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ojai, Ca
Posts: 43
|
Catch them and relocate them to San Miguel Island, where they won't bother anyone and they can join the GWS's buffet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|