![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
BRTF...bought & paid...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,247
|
Man oh man...and at the Surfrider meeting when I mentioned what area I'd like to see stay open in N County, they laughed.
No more surfing for you fellas.... Let's see how they like it when they have to paddle 3 miles to get to a surf spot...
__________________
Adios Tman Gaffer for Clay the Fishcatcher ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 2 inches above sea level
Posts: 503
|
Here's the link to Coastkeeper's proposal:
http://docs.sandiego.gov/councilcomm..._091007-8a.pdf LaJolla specifically is mentioned several times. They want it all. If you can make this meeting, please do!
__________________
"All I got was a rock" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Ho
Posts: 1,382
|
Take Particular Notice of Section 4.
Section 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA ENDORSES THE PLACEMENT OF A FULLY PROTECTED MARINE RESERVE IN LA JOLLA. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 370
|
Yeah funny how they threw in an exact location at the very end.
- Joe |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bay Ho
Posts: 1,382
|
They Mean All of La Jolla.
Thats why they didn't specifically reference a proposed (SMR) as posted on any map. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 370
|
They are clearly trying to sidestep the MLPA process by getting the city involved. We need everyone who fishes in San Diego to show up at this meeting tomorrow.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SD
Posts: 133
|
I'm going. Does anyone have an idea how many are going?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|