![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 698
|
I don't subscribe to the economic argument. If the choice is loss of revenue or loss of species I am going to side with the species, mostly because I like to eat them. I believe Map 2 provides the right balance to conserve both.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 370
|
True and an equal if not a better point. Map 2 is the best solution all around.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|