![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 167
|
I heard the SAT evaluation today was brutal.
They said they didn't have time to look at the socio-economic impact and went purely by bio-pseudo science data. Not surprisingly, since they set up the grading system (remember persistent kelp?), the score was skewed in favor of Group 1 and Group 3. What happened to "stake-holder driven, science-based" initiative. They ignored half of it (the stakeholder-driven part--read: overwhelming public support for Group 2) and focused on the part of the game they set up to control. If I can set up the rule of the game, I can win nearly 100% of most games played. It's that simple. This is a setup for tomorrow's BRTF meeting. Expect ugliness tomorrow in the way the BRTF comes up with the Preferred Alternative Map. That's why we need everyone.
__________________
A spearo, but we are in this MLPA mess together |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|