![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guerro Grande
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 629
|
These are the specs for a range of Humminbird products.
Matrix 12 specs:
Humminbird 325
Humminbird 161 Combo (specs for 160 not listed on website):
PiranhaMax 220
Humminbird 787C
One thing to take note of is that the target separation (sonar beam resolution) on all of them is 2.5 inches. The sonar itself can only resolve down to 2.5 inches. The differences lie in the power, number of beams and screen resolution. Power is probably the least of your concerns if you fish in <200 feet of water. As long as you have a good transducer installation, even a low power unit should get enough signal return to see the bottom. Having a dual beam unit gives you greater coverage of the water column and bottom. The higher resolution screen will allow more detail to be displayed. On a 240X240 pixel screen in 120 feet of water, each pixel is going to represent 6 inches of the water column. On a 420 pixel screen, each pixel will only be 3 inches. The higher resolution screen will allow the data that's available to be displayed more clearly and effectively. In my opinion, you should go with the highest resolution screen that you can afford.
__________________
Douglas Gaxiola |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|