![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 175
|
Diving near their traps is just asking for it. Sometimes its unavoidable, but if I were a commercial guy and saw bubbles or a light hanging out for a bit too long around my gear, I'd be waiting for some soon to be bruised divers to surface.
The UV light thing is weird to me and seems like they would have a hard time getting that to go in court. Unless they can absolutely, "beyond all reasonable doubt", PROVE that it is impossible for those marked lobsters to escape or somehow be reintroduced to the wild legally (ie, commercial guy clearing his trap), how can they convict anyone? Let's say you legally grab a legal sized, marked lobster that has escaped or that some commercial guy accidently threw back. You'd be fucked if DFG stopped you and did the test. Even if only the shorts were marked, you'd still be in a whole different world of trouble when accused of robbing traps than simply coming up with a short lobster. Do they have some way of combatting this? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: south park (san diego),CA
Posts: 119
|
yeah, sounds kinda like my dad sayin if we pee'd in the pool it would turn blue.
![]()
__________________
he hates these cans! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ventura to LJ
Posts: 69
|
If you have to ask the question......YOURE TOO CLOSE TO THEM!
Besides...your way better off finding your own little honey hole not someone elses.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|