How to catch a doormat - Kayak Fishing Adventures on Big Water’s Edge

Billy V · 11-09-2009, 04:24 PM

I'm In.

zenspearo · 11-09-2009, 04:41 PM

I heard the SAT evaluation today was brutal.

They said they didn't have time to look at the socio-economic impact and went purely by bio-pseudo science data. Not surprisingly, since they set up the grading system (remember persistent kelp?), the score was skewed in favor of Group 1 and Group 3.

What happened to "stake-holder driven, science-based" initiative. They ignored half of it (the stakeholder-driven part--read: overwhelming public support for Group 2) and focused on the part of the game they set up to control.

If I can set up the rule of the game, I can win nearly 100% of most games played. It's that simple.

This is a setup for tomorrow's BRTF meeting. Expect ugliness tomorrow in the way the BRTF comes up with the Preferred Alternative Map.

That's why we need everyone.

driftwood · 11-09-2009, 04:59 PM

[QUOTE=zenspearo;46989]I heard the SAT evaluation today was brutal.

They said they didn't have time to look at the socio-economic impact and went purely bybio-pseudo science data. Not surprisingly, since they set up the grading system (remember persistent kelp?), the score was skewed in favor of Group 1 and Group 3.

What happened to "stake-holder driven, science-based" initiative. They ignored half of it (the stakeholder-driven part--read: overwhelming public support for Group 2) and focused on the part of the game they set up to control.

If I can set up the rule of the game, I can win nearly 100% of most games played. It's that simple.

Pseudoscience : A system of theories or assertions about the natural world that claim or appear to be scientific but that, in fact, are not. — The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition.

Pseudoscience is merely theory not fact!!!!

Grego · 11-09-2009, 05:04 PM

Heard about the SAT criticism...numb nuts. The study of economic impacts was mandatory.....and their best excuse is that they "didn't have time"

DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS CRAP!!! BE THERE TOMORROW.

I'm not a doormat...I just catch them, use them like a blanket to keep me warm...unlike Bellcon

kurt · 11-09-2009, 05:33 PM

Shit, another MLPA meeting where we all have to listen to Grego talk about the only halibut he's ever caught.

JPSURF · 11-10-2009, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grego

Heard about the SAT criticism...numb nuts. The study of economic impacts was mandatory.....and their best excuse is that they "didn't have time"

DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS CRAP!!! BE THERE TOMORROW.

I'm not a doormat...I just catch them, use them like a blanket to keep me warm...unlike Bellcon

Don a little less time at the Gym Big Guy!!!

JP

11-09-2009, 04:41 PM	#2
zenspearo Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 167	I heard the SAT evaluation today was brutal. They said they didn't have time to look at the socio-economic impact and went purely by bio-pseudo science data. Not surprisingly, since they set up the grading system (remember persistent kelp?), the score was skewed in favor of Group 1 and Group 3. What happened to "stake-holder driven, science-based" initiative. They ignored half of it (the stakeholder-driven part--read: overwhelming public support for Group 2) and focused on the part of the game they set up to control. If I can set up the rule of the game, I can win nearly 100% of most games played. It's that simple. This is a setup for tomorrow's BRTF meeting. Expect ugliness tomorrow in the way the BRTF comes up with the Preferred Alternative Map. That's why we need everyone. __________________ A spearo, but we are in this MLPA mess together

11-09-2009, 04:59 PM	#3
driftwood Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: SAN DIEGO Posts: 1,086	[QUOTE=zenspearo;46989]I heard the SAT evaluation today was brutal. They said they didn't have time to look at the socio-economic impact and went purely bybio-pseudo science data. Not surprisingly, since they set up the grading system (remember persistent kelp?), the score was skewed in favor of Group 1 and Group 3. What happened to "stake-holder driven, science-based" initiative. They ignored half of it (the stakeholder-driven part--read: overwhelming public support for Group 2) and focused on the part of the game they set up to control. If I can set up the rule of the game, I can win nearly 100% of most games played. It's that simple. Pseudoscience : A system of theories or assertions about the natural world that claim or appear to be scientific but that, in fact, are not. — The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Pseudoscience is merely theory not fact!!!! Last edited by driftwood; 11-09-2009 at 05:53 PM.

11-09-2009, 05:33 PM	#5
kurt Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: 2 inches above sea level Posts: 503	Shit, another MLPA meeting where we all have to listen to Grego talk about the only halibut he's ever caught. __________________ "All I got was a rock"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-09-2009, 04:24 PM	#1
Billy V Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Bay Ho Posts: 1,382	I'm In.

11-09-2009, 05:04 PM	#4
Grego Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 446	Heard about the SAT criticism...numb nuts. The study of economic impacts was mandatory.....and their best excuse is that they "didn't have time" DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS CRAP!!! BE THERE TOMORROW. I'm not a doormat...I just catch them, use them like a blanket to keep me warm...unlike Bellcon