![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jaco, Costa Rica
Posts: 119
|
You get what you pay for on those Ugly Stix. They can't take a beating at all. Easily broke the end off one rod in less than 4 months. The other the braid wore a grove into the the eye tip and thus would weaken the braid so that it broke, again 4 to 6 months.
I won't ever use them again. My Shimano's never have issues, but at three times the price. Love em
__________________
Fishing touring guide service Central Costa Rica. cryaker.com Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Mission Hills, CA
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
I have a 12 year old freshwater 6'8" M Ugly Stik and it still works fine. During the first years of ownership, I used that rod a lot and I was not gentle with it. I've hit it on things multiple times and now it's my loaner rod so it's always getting abused. I also have 2 Shimano Crucials which I'm way more careful with. One has broken twice and the other once, so 3 replacements from Shimano in the last 4 years. My "Lifetime Warranty" that I thought I was paying for when I bought these rods have also magically disappeared. I love my Crucials; they are sensitive and light but durability is definitely not their strong point. Obviously my statement above doesn't apply to all Shimano rods. Shimano makes a ton of different rods for lots of different purposes and lots of different price points. Even my own experience with my old freshwater Ugly Stik is not exactly applicable to a discussion on a modern Ugly Stik Tiger rod but the general consensus on Ugly Stiks seems to be they are really tough. Last edited by CardShark; 05-03-2015 at 12:35 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Junior
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
If you are wearing a groove into the guide, you are either using way too much drag or got a defect Imo. I haven't had problems fishing up to 15# drag with 50# braid. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jaco, Costa Rica
Posts: 119
|
These are the ones I bought.
Shakespeare BWCJL 2200 63 Ugly Stik Tiger Lite Jigging Rod - Casting Never again. Used in a normal fishing setting. Other than defective, I thought they we're a bit bulky, cumbersome and too much action on the tip as another poster pointed out. Maybe these we're defective, but I won't risk finding out again. Plenty of other fine choices for rods. I use Avet's also.
__________________
Fishing touring guide service Central Costa Rica. cryaker.com Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Fishing Patriot
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Jaco, Costa Rica
Posts: 119
|
Bulky was the wrong term to use. More like uneven stiffness. The bottom 3/4 or the rod is overly stiff, while the tip is very playable.
Whereas my Shimano's have much better balance/play throughout the rod.
__________________
Fishing touring guide service Central Costa Rica. cryaker.com Mark |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|