![]() |
|
Home | Forum | Online Store | Information | LJ Webcam | Gallery | Register | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "The Table"
Posts: 976
|
If this goes through I will be offering spots on my boat to fish the Nados. Only problem is I can only fit about 2 kayaks on it. This is lame! They need to just make stricter take rules.
Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: san diego
Posts: 97
|
I agree, and I am all for stricter limits and banning certain commerical harvesting techniquess instead of no fish zones. That strategy has been proven to work in other fisheries (such as FL). But I think at least some of the people on the "other side" actually want 100% closures to all fishing - period. They're just against fishing and prefer we all eat tofu. I don't think stricter limits would satisfy them. That being said, I'd personally like to get more involved and don't want to discourage anyone else from getting involved by going to meetings, voice their opinion, etc.
__________________
that's why they call it fishing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach
Posts: 506
|
PLEASE!!!
Click here Add Yourself to the MLPA Initiative Mailing List or here http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/mailinglist.asp This will keep you up on the latest on the process. You can also view online arcives of the last meetings which will give you a feel of what they are like. Then be ready to give the time to come to the Stakeholders meeting in late June or early July and October to show your support for our fishing areas by attending these meetings.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|